Privacy be damned! The Obamabots want to know!

On Friday the 17th of October I posted a blog voicing my outrage about the way Joe the Plumber has been treated by the Obamabots in the press, but along with the outrage there was no small amount of concern over the way these people went after this man and his privacy. Now, I find the depths this obamabot went to do dig up dirt on Joe is even worse than I knew in the beginning. Did anyone read Orwell's 1984? One of the officials who initiated this outrageous snooping into Joe's private life was Hellen Jones-Kelley, director of Ohio Dept. of Family Services and not surprisingly also contributed the maximum amount to Obama's campaign. Here is her "reasoning"

"Given our understanding that Mr. Wurzelbacher had publicly indicated that he had the means to purchase a substantial business enterprise, ODJFS, consistent with past departmental practice, checked confidential databases ," she wrote.

Are you paying attention to what this woman said? I wonder if she, in the pursuit of consistency, has a file open on every single person in her state who publicly states they live on more than a Welfare check? I bet not.

I'm old enough to remember the height of the cold war...when people simply disappeared off the streets for saying the wrong thing to the wrong person. This still happens in places like, China, North Korea, Burma,Iraq,Iran. And now I see it happening in America before the messiah is even elected, what will it be like if he is elected?

Will the Obama government encourage this citizen snooping? Well, judge for yourself from this speech. The messiah says:

"Loving your country shouldn't just mean watching fireworks on the 4th of July," he said. "Loving your country must mean accepting your responsibility to do your part to change it. If you do, your life will be richer, our country will be stronger."...

"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set," he said Wednesday. "We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded."

Excuse me? That is just as powerful? Just as strong? Just as well funded? What the hell for? Don't we already have a police department in every town and city? And just why in the hell can't we continue to rely on America's military? Haven't they done everything we've asked of them? Don't we already have the National Guard for national emergencies? Could he want a civilian force because he knows when he gives his marching orders to America's military they will refuse an unlawful order? Is he planning on setting up an alternate force--that is in his own words, just as powerful, strong, and well funded to try to force us to do something that is against some of the freedoms that we are guaranteed in this country? Oh wait...the key is the word "civilian" Could it be that he wants to do an end run around the Constitutional prohibition of using the military against our civilian population and the way to do it is call this powerful, strong, well funded organization a civilian national security force?

This guy is dangerous. What he wants to do to our nation is dangerous and we must not allow it.